|
|
Roadmap - Questionaire Responses for AA CAMP 2004 |
Back to
index
(editors)
Back to
index
(techies/administrators)
Add new suggestion
(editors)
Add new suggestion
(techies/administrators)
1. Main problems and annoyances you encounter when using ActionApps
In tens, please (ten pound notes) http://dangky4gvinaphone.vn/minomycin-baikal-pharmacycom-kwwb buy minomycin baikal-pharmacy.com
Why? The short answer is Russia’s Security Council veto. For those of us who were involved in the Iraq and Kosovo crises, the current arguments about Syria carry haunting resonance. In all those cases there have been widespread demands that any action taken should be “legal”. The canonical interpretation of that much argued word is “in accordance with the UN Charter”. But the Charter is inconveniently clear on the justifications for using force. There are just two: either you are attacked or you get Security Council authorisation. And on none of these issues was Russia going to allow Security Council assent to the use of armed force.
2. Features suggested for future development versions of ActionApps
In tens, please (ten pound notes) http://dangky4gvinaphone.vn/minomycin-baikal-pharmacycom-kwwb buy minomycin baikal-pharmacy.com
Why? The short answer is Russia’s Security Council veto. For those of us who were involved in the Iraq and Kosovo crises, the current arguments about Syria carry haunting resonance. In all those cases there have been widespread demands that any action taken should be “legal”. The canonical interpretation of that much argued word is “in accordance with the UN Charter”. But the Charter is inconveniently clear on the justifications for using force. There are just two: either you are attacked or you get Security Council authorisation. And on none of these issues was Russia going to allow Security Council assent to the use of armed force.
3. Comments About Usablility
In tens, please (ten pound notes) http://dangky4gvinaphone.vn/minomycin-baikal-pharmacycom-kwwb buy minomycin baikal-pharmacy.com
Why? The short answer is Russia’s Security Council veto. For those of us who were involved in the Iraq and Kosovo crises, the current arguments about Syria carry haunting resonance. In all those cases there have been widespread demands that any action taken should be “legal”. The canonical interpretation of that much argued word is “in accordance with the UN Charter”. But the Charter is inconveniently clear on the justifications for using force. There are just two: either you are attacked or you get Security Council authorisation. And on none of these issues was Russia going to allow Security Council assent to the use of armed force.
4. General future development suggestions
n/a
Submited by:
zZaQkQJsEhOsKAkGAGT
|
 |
APC
ActionApps is a free software content management system initiated by
the Association for Progressive Communications (APC) APC - Internet and ICTs for social justice and development |